Discos Take-Over: Power Firms Fight Back, Accuse FG Of Not Paying N100bn For Electricity Subsidy

…Says Information Provided By BPE During Privatisation Inaccurate

The federal government has been accused of failing to provide the N100bn subsidy on electricity since the privatisation of the sector in 2013.

The accusation is coming from the 11 Electricity Distribution Companies at a time when the federal government had officially taken over five Discos by the Federal Government through the Bureau of Public Enterprises.

The federal government had taken over the Kano, Benin and Kaduna electricity distribution companies through Fidelity Bank Plc after the bank had initiated action to take over the boards of the three Discos.

The government had also announced through the Bureau of Public Enterprises that with the takeover of Ibadan Disco by the Asset Management Corporation of Nigeria, the BPE had obtained approval from the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission to appoint an interim managing director for the power firm.

The government had stated in a notice that it was restructuring the management and board of the Port Harcourt Disco to forestall an alleged imminent insolvency of the utility. The notice was jointly signed by the Director-General, BPE, Alex Okoh and the Executive Chairman, NERC, Sanusi Garba.

But the Discos described the move as a backdoor renationalisation of the power firms.

They claimed that investors in the 11 Discos were shortchanged by BPE when the facilities were privatised in November 2013, while the government had failed to pay the N100bn subsidy on electricity since the privatisation of the sector.

Speaking under the aegis of the Association of Nigerian Electricity Distributors, an umbrella body for the power firms, the Discos in a statement expressed concern about the restructuring of the five companies as announced by BPE on July 5, 2022, in collaboration with the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission.

The Executive Director, Research and Advocacy, ANED, Sunday Oduntan, said that the association viewed the restructuring to be inconsistent with all the guidelines necessary to comply with the framework of privatisation agreements and the rule of law.

It gave other areas of failure by the government to include its inability to implement a cost reflective electricity tariff, stressing that this singular unfulfilled condition had led to accrued significant debt and liabilities on the Discos’ financial books, as Discos continued to sell electricity below the cost price.

ANED further stated that the government had failed in the private management of the Transmission Company of Nigeria, currently, a government-owned and operated entity.

It said the privatisation of TCN was a major requirement for attracting the private investment critical in addressing the transmission bottleneck currently belittling the Nigerian Electricity Supply Industry value chain.

The statement reads, “We believe that it is reasonable to conclude that the resultant outcome has been an expropriation or backdoor renationalisation of the Discos by the Federal Government,

“Such renationalisation or expropriation must be viewed through a historical context as necessary for a proper understanding of the performance challenges that the Discos have been faced with since privatisation.

“Fundamentally, the basis of privatisation was flawed from the beginning due to conditions that were not met by the Federal Government, while expecting the Discos to meet their performance obligations.

“Not only were the investors shortchanged because of insufficient and unreliable data that was provided by BPE to them during the privatisation process, but the government also committed to and failed to deliver on debt-free financial books; payment of ministries, department and agencies electricity debts; and N100bn subsidy.
“These commitments have remained largely unmet over the post-privatisation period and have belatedly been partially addressed – too late to rectify current performance challenges.

“While the Discos are not exonerated from responsibility for performance failures, it would be unrealistic to reach related conclusions without taking into consideration the factors that have been listed previously, as well as the Federal Government’s contributions to these challenges.”

It added, “Furthermore, there is an established process by which a change of a corporate entity’s board of directors and management occurs. As such, it is with much surprise that the Disco investors awoke to the July 5, 2022, renationalisation or expropriation of the five Discos.”

The association argued that due process was not followed and that the federal government, as a 40 per cent minority shareholder, was represented by the director-general of BPE on the board of each of the Discos and was party to all decisions concerning the operations of the Discos.