Metuh Reaffirms Loyalty To Jonathan, ‘I Only Need Him To Prove My Innocence’

Former spokesman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh, says his loyalty to former President Goodluck Jonathan has never been in doubt.

In a statement released Thursday, Metuh said he would never allow himself to be used to drag the ex-president down, adding that he only needs Jonathan to testify as a defence witness in his trial to prove his innocence.

Advertisement

Metuh is currently standing trial over allegations of money laundering. The former PDP Spokesperson is alleged to have received N400 million meant for procurement of arms from the office of the national security adviser.

“It is, therefore, inconceivable and completely ridiculous for anybody to think that I would for any reason betray or surrender myself to be used against President Goodluck Jonathan, for whom I have immense respect and served diligently, without any apologies, in and out of office,” the statement read.

“To what end will I conspire with the same set of people, who singled me out to be humiliated and openly handcuffed, while spreading all manner of malicious stories against me, most of which they even denied outright in court while others remain completely unsubstantiated?

“Ordinarily, the content of the charge against me in the Federal High Court should not breed any worries but for the fact that it now appears that the anti-corruption fight has shifted the burden of proof to a defendant once an allegation is made.

Advertisement

“Without prejudice to all the foregoing, I accept that it was the need for corroboration of lack of mens rea on my part that led my lawyers to request for the evidence of the respected former President to assist them in proving my innocence.”

Jonathan failed to appear before the federal high court in Abuja on Thursday, after he was reportedly invited by the presiding judge, Justice Okon Abang.

However, Metuh said following the controversies that have risen from Jonathan’s invitation, he would instruct his lawyers to review the subpoena.

“However, with all the controversies arising from the reports of the said pronouncements and the attendant concerns thereof, I have instructed my legal team to revisit and review the entire issue of the subpoena,” he added.

Leave a comment

Advertisement