A Federal High Court in Lagos has on Thursday, retrained the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC) from giving effect to its proposed hike in electricity tariff.
The Chairman of NERC, Dr. Sam Amadi, had, at a press briefing in May, disclosed the plan by the commission to embark on an increment in electricity tariff across the country, to take effect from June 1.
But pursuant to an ex parte application filed by a Lagos-based lawyer, Mr. Toluwani Adebiyi, Justice Mohammed Idris, had on May 28, restrained NERC from going ahead with the proposed hike.
NERC however, filed an application seeking to discharge the restraining order, claiming that Adebiyi misrepresented facts before the court and misled the court to grant same.
Adebiyi is contending that the move by NERC to increase electricity tariff in the country would “foist further hardship on Nigerians” and any such increment in electricity tariff was unjustifiable in the face of poor or erratic supply of electricity by the distributing companies.
He implored that the court stop any hike in electricity tariff until there has been a meaningful and significant improvement in power supply to at least 18 hours in a day in most Nigerian communities.
Adebiyi is also asking the court to mandate the NERC to make available to all Nigerians, prepaid meters within a maximum time frame of two years. This, he said, would curb “the throat-cutting, indiscriminate estimated bill, which must be devoid of the arbitrary service charge, but only chargeable on power consumers.”
In his affidavit supporting the suit, Adebiyi lamented, “Businesses have collapsed, industries have closed down, and residents cannot sleep comfortably at night due to inefficiency of our power industry.
“Companies and commercial houses are groaning under throat-cutting power bill which they are paying for, yet not getting the benefit for such payment.
“Bringing further increase amidst this tangled web of hardship and without any improvement in power supply will be highly unjustifiable and will be an economic burden on the Nigerian populace.
“It is totally absurd and not for the good of the people, and therefore must be stopped.”
Mr. George Uwechue (SAN), Counsel for the NERC, argued that the motion ex parte on which basis the restraining order was granted was an abuse of court process, he stated that the applicant failed to explore and exhaust all available remedies before rushing to court.
In his ruling, Justice Mohammed Idris disapproved Uwechue’s arguments and dismissed the application, as he held that the application was not filed within seven days as stipulated by Order 26 Rule 11 and the applicant did not seek extension of time.
This failure, according to the judge, had rendered the defendant’s application, seeking to discharge the restraining order, incompetent.
“The ex-parte order of this court restraining hike in electricity tariff is valid and still subsisting,” the judge held.
The judge also struck out the preliminary objection and application to nullify the order brought by NERC.
The judge held that the defendant breached the provisions of Order 29, Rule 4 of the court’s Civil Procedure Rules by failing to file its preliminary objection within 21 days of being served with the applicant’s originating summons.
He held, “The learned Senior Advocate for the defendant holds the view that the provision is discretionary. I honestly and sincerely disagree with that view.
“In the circumstances, I hold that the preliminary objection was filed in breach of the rules of the court.
“The objection filed is therefore, in my view, incompetent and is hereby struck out.”
The matter was thereafter adjourned till September 23, 2015 for the hearing of the substantive suit.